The Democratic Alliance (DA) in Gauteng strongly condemns the remarks made by Gauteng Health MEC Nomantu Nkomo-Ralehoko regarding the compulsory administration of contraceptives to schoolgirls aged 12 and older without their consent. These reckless utterances have angered children and their parents. We share that anger. The MEC has dangerously trivialised serious problems with a so-called solution that is grossly harmful.
The MEC ought to have known that her statements, which she has since retracted and described as “misinterpreted,” would raise significant ethical concerns regarding the autonomy and rights of young individuals. The Children’s Act No. 38 of 2005 empowers children aged 12 years and older with the authority to consent to contraceptive services without requiring parental consent, provided they are deemed mature enough to understand their decision, receive appropriate medical advice, and undergo a medical examination to determine no medical contraindications against the contraceptive provided.
This legislation highlights the significance of informed consent and respecting minors’ rights to make their own health choices. The MEC’s suggestion to enforce compulsory contraception not only disregards these rights but also conflicts with the principles established in the Children’s Act, which aims to protect and empower children rather than impose medical interventions on them.
The DA Gauteng rejects these statements and demands that Premier Panyaza Lesufi investigate them and hold the MEC accountable. Leaders must set an example and not express their personal views as policy or law.
A DA-led Gauteng provincial government would deal with teenage pregnancy by ensuring access to sex education and contraception methods in our schools as well as preventing the stigmatisation of pregnant learners. By addressing both education and support, we aim to reduce the rates of teenage pregnancy effectively.
The DA Gauteng remains committed to protecting the rights of young people in Gauteng. We will continue to oppose any actions that undermine their autonomy and well-being, even if these actions come from an MEC who has sworn to uphold and protect the Constitution and the human rights it guarantees.